top of page

Why Electric Vehicles May Not Be the Future?

Why Electric Vehicles May Not Be the Future?

History of Electric Vehicles

Although electric vehicles have advanced significantly, many other forms of mobility do not share their shortcomings. You can get a strong sense that electric vehicles are unquestionably the future if you look around. In fact, Elon Musk momentarily became the richest man in the world thanks to Tesla's rising share price, and the business announced its first profitable year since its founding in 2003.

Municipalities are also putting in charge stations and expanding their fleet of electric vehicles. In addition, established automakers like Ford and GM have made commitments to stop producing gasoline-powered cars altogether starting in 2035, while direct rivals to Tesla-like Lucid are starting to emerge.

Electric vehicles have been around since the late 19th century when the first ones initially appeared. Belgian Camille Jenatzy broke the land speed record in 1899 by traveling 65 MPH in an electric car. Although breaking the 100 KM/H (just over 62 MPH) barrier at the time may not seem all that noteworthy to someone who isn't willingly cruising around in a Fiat 500, it was a huge accomplishment.

Is the future actually electric, though? Perhaps not. Global concern over carbon emissions and a desire to reduce them before the situation becomes unmanageable have been the key driving forces behind the hype.

Electric Vehicles Aren't as clean as they appear

There is no question that they are cleaner overall than fossil fuel-powered vehicles. The fact that your car isn't emitting any pollutants, however, does not imply that it hasn't had any effect on the environment. Carbon emissions from the manufacture of the car itself can account for 5–10% of the CO2 produced throughout a car's lifetime.

Due to their batteries, electric automobiles are at the top of the ranking. Like any automobile parts, those batteries will eventually need to be replaced if someone wants to keep their vehicle on the road and lessen its impact on the environment. To their credit, Tesla makes an effort to recycle or extend the life of every lithium-ion battery used in their automobiles.

The energy to power the car must come from someplace, though, when it is on the road. Fossil fuels are still generally effective for getting you from point A to point b because they make up around 60% of the electricity produced in the United States from oil, coal, and gas.

The range also plays an important role

Most conditions are well suited for an electric vehicle. There isn't much risk of becoming stuck on the side of the road halfway through your daily commute if you charge your devices wisely. However, a sizeable portion of the population finds it difficult to monitor their gas gauge, therefore the effects of an empty tank aren't as bad.

You can always get to a gas station, fill a can with petrol, and have enough energy to get your car to the pump and properly fill up if you find yourself stuck in your driveway or on the road. Tesla vehicles need a tow truck or a generator to recharge their batteries.

Naturally, Tesla will make every effort to notify the driver when it needs to be charged. To save energy, it will indicate nearby charging stations that are still within reach and restrict their own speed. You can still run a flat, though. People ignore the fuel warning lights on regular cars and their cell phones, which are always pleading for a charge.

Then there is range. Some of Tesla's models were able to travel more than 400 miles, and electric rival Lucid pledges to break the 500-mile range barrier.

As long as you're not the electric equivalent of a quarter-tank person, that's excellent for daily use once more. However, it is not ideal for lengthy car trips. Yes, not everyone needs to travel from New York to Florida in one go, but those who do would undoubtedly prefer to fill up their tank in five minutes than spend several hours waiting for their batteries to recharge at a truck stop.

What Alternatives Are There?

Hybrid vehicles and vehicles that run on hydrogen are now the two rivals. Electricity and hydrogen both have environmental problems, primarily because the gas is currently extracted using energy-intensive methods. Additionally, of the three possibilities, it is the most expensive. There is still a long way to go before this changes, but it might be when hydrogen extraction techniques are improved and cars are more widely used.

The ability to fill your tank with actual gas in about the same amount of time as it takes to fill it with "gasoline" is one advantage. We are unlikely to run out of it anytime soon because it is the most prevalent element in the universe.

Another category is hybrids. To give you more range, a typical hybrid powertrain may run on both gasoline and batteries. The idea is straightforward and efficient. Although it still isn't as environmentally friendly as an electric or hydrogen-powered vehicle, it is still better than a standard car.

It can be refueled in around five minutes, just like you can with your ordinary vehicle. There are also plug-in hybrids, allowing you to benefit from an electric car's advantages while still having a petrol tank as a get-out-of-jail-free card.

Incorporating biofuel into the equation (which may burn up to 86% cleaner than gasoline) improves hybrids and makes it possible to keep today's gasoline-powered automobiles on the road.

Electric vehicles are less clean than cellulosic and sugar cane ethanol biomass nationwide, where they are 60% less clean than gas-powered vehicles. Although electric vehicles have advanced significantly, many other forms of mobility do not share their shortcomings. They will improve, but many alternative vehicles could travel far farther.

4 views1 comment

1 Comment

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Apr 18
Rated 4 out of 5 stars.

Bitter Truth

bottom of page